10/1 p2

looking at rauschenberg i would like to see the objects — but what is gained by that — it’s impossible to see every rauschenberg — or even a lot of them without some special circumstances —
what about an art that’s not meant to be seen as is — but through media — (animation and computer designed things don’t do it for me — computer generated rooms etc — architectural models) pieces that exist only for a while — web exhibits
(what about sound)
with brochures — invite cards etc
possibly some printed works
art on CD or DVD —
multiple views — install an assemblage and take a lot of photos —
can i retrieve things from the goodwill idea — i should be able to remember most of the things that i got there (and if i make a mistake?)
still looking at GLUTS — installations
there is something very attractive about having a space for large installations —
(a large loose leaf binder from school system that i bought — ideas for overprinting pages etc —)

(i need a large burst of energy to get this stuff organized)


WEB BROWSE reduced gallery list to just a few —
itinerary —
looking at web sites — ideas for virtual gallery — what is real what is virtual — to be virtually somewhere —

<arrow pointing back probably to p92 with word plays on virtual and real>


installation in the house — or virtually — physical & virtual works hypo physical

(is there an opposite to meta)

(should i shave this morning)

about 11AM — coffee is finished — a lot of time to do nothing — listen or study japanese —


<type arranged on grid page>


? SHOULD I DRIVE TO GALVESTON

COMB THE BEACH
ADD SOMETHING TO THE GALVESTON ART —

10/09-2
elaborate on these ideas - knowing most of ones art is not going to be seen by many people — why not no one — just documentation